Mte 520 Management Matrix Essay - 617 Words

Materials Management Matrix Learning Team B Jessica Berry, Andrew Brogan, Silvia Hammond, Erica Priscella Maintaining an Effective Learning Climate 520 Keith Jarrett February 10, 2013 Materials Management Matrix Learning Team B Issues requiring documentation | Current tools used | Additional technology options available | Documentation methods for staff review | Documentation methods for parent review | Calendars | Microsoft ® Outlook ® Blackboard calendar Desk calendar Wall calendar | Google calendar Yahoo calendar Famundo.com Calendars.net | Update information on school calendar.Provide link to online monthly calendar. | Paper calendars sent home with students Classroom website E-mail | Grades | Power SchoolWeekly†¦show more content†¦Select two issues requiring documentation and compare the systems used by each team member. What are the benefits and challenges of each system? Two of the issues requiring documentation are behavior related and

The First Time - Original Writing - 1987 Words

The first time I met her, I thought she was beautiful. And maybe you wouldn t think that, if you saw her; she was fairly ordinary. Dark brown hair, loose and flowing like willow leaves in a storm, and bright eyes, the rich colour of a dying sunset. You wouldn t have seen her like that, probably. I think she didn t want to be seen. I was always good at seeing people. The first time I met him, his hair was even darker than hers, and his eyes burned like the last breaths of a dying fire. He wanted to be seen this time, and he got his wish. Not a single person who passed him by could take their eyes off him, least of all me. There was a spark to him, a kind of magic. I wished I could be magic. The last time I saw her, she was†¦show more content†¦The entire boring school day was normal - same boring lessons, same tasteless food, same strange conversations with the same strange friends I always talked with. Of, course, we were all wondering why we had assembly; After all, we were on Fridays, not Tuesdays. We all walked in and sat down, preparing ourselves for another half hour of mind numbing boredom to add to our days. Then she stood up. She was lovely, like an old statue of some ancient goddess. Her hair cascaded in a waterfall of dark silk down her shoulders, her bright amber eyes throwing back the overhead lights in a way that made them shine like the moon. My sharp inhalation echoed off the walls of the near-silent auditorium, and in the aftermath you could practically hear the flush that filled my face. My blush only darkened when she sought out my eyes and her face settled into a mirthful smile. It still didn t stop me from smiling back. ...Like her to introduce herself. I jolted back to myself at the sound of our Year Head s voice, glad for once to hear him raise his voice. I d been so lost in my thoughts, (and definitely not this new girls eyes) that I d almost missed her name. Hmm... She paused, as if she was having trouble remembering her name, before saying Ellie. I m Ellie - it s going to be very nice to get to know you. All of you. She dropped a smirk in my direction on the first you , and I

Interpretations of the Reichstag Fire Free Essays

i) Van der Lubbe was a madman, and he set fire to the Reichstag all by himself, but the Nazis genuinely believed the fire was the start of a Communist uprising. ii) The Reichstag Fire was started by the Nazis to give them an excuse to take emergency powers and lock up or kill the Communists. Van der Lubbe was used by the Nazis. We will write a custom essay sample on Interpretations of the Reichstag Fire or any similar topic only for you Order Now Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period? Explain your answer. It’s difficult to incline the balance to any of both interpretations because both of them have evidence to backup them. Source A for instance, supports the first interpretation, it suggests that Lubbe acted a lone and Diels to backup his words tells that it would be easily set the fire because the old furniture, dry wood, and heavy curtains would made the fire spread rapidly, while Lubbe could be starting fires elsewhere in the building running through the long corridors. In the other hand Source I contradict directly the other source, because it says that a man who was handicapped both physically and mentally, without knowledge of the place and with the brief time given couldn’t possibly set the fire on its own. As we can see both of the sources use well supported theories, however, Source I seems to be best well supported because despite the inflammable materials which were there, he was handicapped, didn’t know the place and he didn’t even have time, also, Source I its from an history book what suggest me that the theory would been well studied by historians to arrive that conclusion. In support of statement i) Source B shows Lubbe’s confession which tells â€Å"I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself†, here we could say that Lubbe set the fire on his own, and due to his madness he could set the fire on his own for then boast about his â€Å"great job†. However there are too many reasons were he could be lying to take in favour this source, he could be protecting communists, or maybe under pressure by the own Nazis, or simply despite he was helped he would preferred to tell everyone he set the fire on himself to â€Å"show off†. In the other hand, we have other sources suggesting that the Nazis were implicated in the fire, Source E for example shows General Franz telling that on Hitler’s birthday three years before, Goring said â€Å"The only one who really knows about the Reichstag building is I, for I set fire to it†, General Franz could have reasons to tell the truth because know he didn’t have any kind of Nazi pressure on him and also he might had nothing to loose. Anyway, he also could be lying show the reliability here is very questionable, he could be telling that for saving himself, to revenge on him. However, it was at Hitler’s birthday, so Goring could been easily drunk and say that in a joke (despite there was the possibility that the alcohol could make say what he shouldn’t say). Goring in Source F describes of â€Å"ridiculous† the statement before, he could be telling the truth and said that in sense of a joke while he was drunk, which explains why he didn’t remember nothing he said, so maybe the two are telling the truth – Halder could take too seriously what for Goring was a joke while he was drunk to make some fun on Hitler’s birthday. However it Halder was telling the truth and Goring said that seriously its obvious that Goring would have defend himself as shown in Source F. Most likely Halder could misunderstand Goring’s joke so the value of his evidence could hardly support the second statement. D and G are two of the less reliable Source shown here, they are both pieces of propaganda by blaming the enemy for the fire. The two of them were published in convenience of the party and both of them lack of evidence to backup them so we cannot consider them seriously. It appears that Source H the best well supported source contradicting the second statement though its took from an history book so the evidence on it is most likely to be true. It suggest that the Nazis didn’t expected the fire at all because the measures taken after it couldn’t be plan, most importantly the fact that the Nazi party had to use out-of-date lists to arrest the communists and that the Nazis had hoped to destroy the Communists after the election (however, this last statement is very subjective). Obviously, the Nazis would have made ample preparations if they planned the fire and this source shows they didn’t, this possibly one of the bests pieces of evidence (if we assume the book is telling the truth) against the theory that the Nazis were behind the fire. In conclusion we can say that none of both interpretations is more supported by the sources than other because they almost balance equally with sources in favour or against. We have to say that some sources suggest that that Lubbe didn’t acted alone which in the same way that suggests that could been helped by communists they could be also helped by the Nazis. The most important thing is the weight and reliability that each source have, and all of them have reasons to not be true. For my interpretation of the sources and my knowledge it would be more likely that the Nazis took part in the fire. The first statement isn’t very well supported because despite the evidence in their favour (such the fact that the fire could be spread very rapidly due to the materials inside) Van der Lubbe couldn’t make such a high damage and devastation as shown in source J, it’s very hard to believe that all that damage could be done a person who hardly had any time (before being caught), who didn’t have any knowledge of the place, and who had a severe sight problem and so mentally ones. The curious thing that makes you think is that the fire was made just one week before the elections, very possibly the Nazis could have planned the fire as an excuse to use the emergency powers, by blaming the Communists of an uprising and so crushing the opposition in favour for their elections. Because we got to remember that Hitler’s greatest fear at that time was the Communism. How to cite Interpretations of the Reichstag Fire, Papers

Artemisia Gentileschi free essay sample

Primarily strong contrasting lights and darkness display Gentileschi’s work, perhaps inspired by both her father and Caravaggio. Her paintings are all primarily bold compositions for example the way the subject matters are placed in the paintings you cant help but look at them, also the vivid colors Gentileschi used help with that too the deep red curtains and ultramarine sheets. This painting is quite large and is a horizontal rectangular format while using oil on canvas. (â€Å"Venus and Cupid†) The primary subject matter of the painting, Venus and Cupid, is Venus, the Goddess of Love. Artemisia Gentileschi seems to portray powerful women for example Judith, Susanna, Cleopatra, and Danae, depicted either as heroines or victims in the paintings. Cupid is also important in this painting, him being the son of Venus, he seems to be portraying the image of an overseer or a protector while Venus seems to be freely sleeping. We will write a custom essay sample on Artemisia Gentileschi or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page (â€Å"Venus and Cupid†) The artist is known to portray powerful women with meaningful subject matter as mentioned before. I also believe that Artemisia, the artist, chose this subject matter because this painting and scene was a perfect way for her display her extended education. This painting may have been a way to show her life, experiences and her luxurious life that she was living before Artemisia’s life hit tragedy. (A. , Sarah) Artemisia had been raped by Agostino Tassi, after which he promised to marry her but later broke it off, her father then went to the police and turned Tassi in, in the trial process Artemisia was tortured to figure out if the story she was telling about the rape was true or not. (â€Å"Art HERstory â€Å") The way Venus’s beauty is depicted in this picture of her resting so peacefully on the couch. In my opinion, Gentileschi may have put her self in place of all those women emotionally that she had painted throughout her career, even if the paintings were commissioned she may have added a hint of herself in them judging by her past. Gentileschi may have related to some of them or wished to be like some of them. In this particular painting she may have made it thinking of herself in place of Venus almost as a self- portrait of how she hoped her life was rather than how it turned out. For the 17th century, this painting fits right in along with the others. Most paintings from the century were paintings using oil on canvas. Many famous artists during that time period had adopted this trend to depict reclining beauty. Also, if an even closer observation can be made, you notice that in the background there is a temple. This temple is similar to the temple which has been built in the honor of Venus. The temple in the background is there to remind the viewer the importance of Venus, the Goddess of Love. That part of the painting seemed like the most intriguing part because it seems to stand out more because it just seems to be out there. Cupid seems to blending more into the background, maybe the artist is trying to display that Cupid may be more imaginary and just there to protect Venus from evil. (â€Å"The 17th Century†) The bed sheet, on which Venus is sleeping on, is actually supposed to have been painted using the color, ultramarine. The colors used are very strong, dark and cool which allow the main character to basically stand out of the painting. The colors basically compliment the painting well because it sets the mood for the entire environment. (â€Å"Venus and Cupid†) If you know a little about the Roman mythology, which is very similar to Greek mythology, you should remember that Cupid is supposedly the child of Venus. Knowing this little fact makes the painting even more understandable. It allows the viewer to visualize the relationship between mother and son. Gentileschi may have wanted to send the message of love between mother and son through this painting. Another way to look at it is if you look at her other paintings Gentileschi revolved her paintings around subject matters of women who were known for their courage, beauty and simplicity. Her paintings mostly consisted of women being dramatically nude in which it showed her style, which is dramatic realism. Therefore there are many ways to interpret the painting Venus and Cupid by Artemisia Gentileschi, it’s just the matter of how you see it.